Thursday , May 19 2022

Facebook, Twitter Crack Down on AI Babysitter Rating Service



[ad_1]

Facebook and Twitter are operating against an administrator's system for the scale of guards reported last week by The Washington Post, saying that the service has broken the rules of social networks on consumer surveillance and data privacy.

Predictim, starting California based, analyzes online stories of babysitters, including on Facebook and Twitter, and they offer degrees at risk of drug misuse, bullying or having a "bad attitude". Facebook said it was limited expressing Predictim access to user information on Instagram and Facebook a few weeks ago for banning a ban on the use of developers of personal data to evaluate a person for decisions on hiring or a qualification.

Katy Dormer spokeswoman said the company had also launched an inquiry earlier this week to extract Predictim, or "scrapped" personal data. That investigation goes on and could include further penalties.

Twitter spokesman Nick Pacilio said the site had conducted its own inquiry earlier this week and the abolition of Predictim access to important web-based tools – called application programming interfaces, or APIs – which would allow & # 39; r begin to review and analyze huge tweets of babies.

"We prohibit the use of Twitter data and APIs in detail for surveillance purposes, including performing background checks," Pacilio said.

The cut, which was first reported by BBC News, could limit Predictim's ability to analyze infants with what is known as "advanced artificial knowledge" and to sell the results to parents. The service was critically criticized for offering incorrect and potentially incorrect consequences that could affect the life of the babies.

But Predictim operators said Tuesday they were void and intend to continue to extract data available to the public from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. P Pictictim, chief executive and co-founder of Sal Parsa, said he also believed that the reaction of the social media guardian had at least partly rooted in a competitive competition over the use of personal data.

"Twitter and Facebook are already mining our data. There's a lot there, consumer generated data. Now there is another start that tries to take advantage of that data to help parents choose babies better , and do some money in the process, "he said. "I do not know why they have a branch on us. It could be because there is no benefit to them."

Dormer, a Facebook spokeswoman, said that continuing to use Predictim from Facebook data would be a direct violation of network rules. "This is not just about making sure that the apps on our platform protect people's data," he said.

Parsaictim's chief technology officer Parsa and Joel Simonoff said in recent weeks and had received a letter from Twitter on Monday. Changes would not hurt the accuracy of their algorithms, says Parsa, because the company has "decided to disclose data from other means."

The company announces that it has trained its algorithms on "more than 6 billion data points" to assess the "personality's important characteristics" of the babysitter, works to expand its analyzes to include data from jobs Babysitters blog and Reddit activity, says Parsa.

"If you do not hide anything, if you do not abuse, if you do not have a bully, I do not see why you'd be afraid to leave for a kid to see who you are, "said Parsa.

It is not clear how the change could affect the spread of Prediction. Sandra Dainora, head of the product at Sittercity, a baby market who had said he intended to use Predictim analyzes as part of a pilot screening program next year, said Tuesday "our consumer's security and privacy is crucial" and & # 39; to be "sure this news will be taken into account as we are the vet of the service."

The Maryland attorney, who specializes in social media and privacy law, is Brad Shear, saying that Predictim problems can run much deeper than that. The site, he says, seems to break a ban on employers who ask for job applicants that check or give access to personal social media accounts. Such requests may run far from law in 26 states, according to data from the National Delegation National Conference. Parsa said that the service was "absolutely legal".

"What they do is only against public policy: Issues related to First Amendment, issues of the Fourth Amendment. If you talk to any lawyer out, they will say that it is is totally scandalous of what predictions are trying to sell, "said Shear.

"The fact that they would believe that this was obviously showing that they had some ethical issues," he added. "They sell snake oil and say they can predict people's personalities and misleading parents along the way."

© The Washington Post 2018

<! – –

->

[ad_2]
Source link