Tuesday , May 24 2022

FTC will not even tell the Senedd if it intends to try to press a trillion-dollar from Facebook


Photo: Getty

Back in 2011, Facebook set up a case with the Federal Trade Commission and signed a unique place where he promised to follow a number of guidelines to protect consumer privacy. Originally the original Cambridge Analytica scandal this year shows that Facebook has broken that agreement and could face "trillion dollars" in fines. But eight months later, the FTC will not say what is happening with an investigation.

On Tuesday, the FTC commissioners sat before the Senate Consumer Protection Sub-Committee to discuss the agency's current priorities. At the top of the list of virtually all parliamentarians, what the FTC is doing to protect consumer privacy and maintain technology companies is accountable. In its opening statement, the chairman of the Republican sub-committee, Senator Jerry Moran, criticized the recent data breaches tested by Facebook and Google, and acknowledged that it was clear enough time passed federal consumer data privacy law. He said he hoped to work with the FTC on drafting that legislation and learning what equipment the agency needs to do.

If the FTC, in fact, is doing his job and investigating whether Facebook has broken its 2011 decree decree, the chairman of the agency, Joseph Simons, would not say. When Senator Richard Blumenthal asked Simons when the FTC investigation was complete and when the results were presented to the public, it was only "I am inappropriate to comment on a specific investigation non-public. " That is a standard response to any question about his investigations, including when Senator Edward Markey asked if the FTC looks at YouTube and the controversial targeting of children of children with fraudulent marketing practices.

There were two important issues that came up repeatedly during the hearing: the FTC claims that it needs more resources and everyone recognizes that the agency has a poor history of enforcement. In its opening statement, Commissioner Rohit Chopra contacted the two issues with each other, saying that the FTC is willing to accept a settlement too often to avoid expensive trial. "Although big penalties are being made for good headlines, I'm questioning whether they really prevent breach of the assault," said Chopra.

This point makes it more clear that the agency has an excellent case on its hands to use it as an example that it will follow on enforcing its threats. Facebook has admitted that it has misused 87 million data and let it be part of a political data analysis company that worked for the Trump presidential election campaign. This was something he was aware of in 2015 but it only became public in March. The app developer who sucked all that data from Facebook users asked for their permission, but was not allowed to collect data from consumer friends. That could be contrary to the 2011 authorization award, where Facebook agreed to inform users and obtain specific permission before sharing data with third parties that fall outside of consumer privacy settings.

In March, Washington Post spoke to David Vladeck, the former FTC point person on Facebook settlement. Vladeck told the Post that for the case of Cambridge Analytica "he raises serious questions about complying with the FTC's consent decree." Facebook rejected "any suggestion contrary to the decree of permission," but Vladeck said that he was fully expecting the FTC to launch an investigation. Although Vladeck told the Post that Facebook could face a fine in "the billions of dollars," because he agreed to pay $ 40,000 in violation, he suspected that the agency would put such a heavy hand.

Still, the FTC could do it something, anything really It has been weird to listen to the Facebook investor calls since the scandal broke earlier this year and not to hear any questions about potential fines that could come. The FTC will do its job almost as investors with no confidence. I can not think of a better way for the agency to prove that the idea is wrong.

Source link