Thursday , January 21 2021

Disney continues to use science instead of a young female personality



Last year The Nutcracker and the Four Realms mostly cinematic cotton candles, but it has been stuck in my station ever since I saw it. Although he did not remake, nor a sequence, to any Disney movie that I saw from the front, he gave me a powerful sense of déjà vu.

He recently ridiculed me why: The Nutcracker and remake live action 2017 Beauty and the Beast each denotes a progressive and feminist sense by dressing their heroine in pants, and giving her one characteristic characteristic: a love of science.

I have no problem with Disney's pivoting all his live action heroines to be science nerds. But the devil is in the details: Along the actual journeys of the characters, there is no excitement to the way these features are integrated, or any use when it comes to; w place in the story.

In both films, the leaders show their love of science in friendly ways, expressing their interest or tinkering them (to a controversial effect) unclear with some curve that would suit them. more comfortable on a steampunk convention floor. The use for their scientific effort is limited to scenarios designed for them, rather than being a meaningful contribution. For example, Belle initially produces a washing machine prototype Beauty and the Beast never cook again. Otherwise, the scientific method is largely forgotten.


Belle (Emma Watson) and her father (Kevin Kline) in Beauty and the Beast.

Belle (Emma Watson) and her father (Kevin Kline) in Beauty and the Beast.
Disney

Tim Burton's new character Dumbo confirms this headline for STEM subjects as a trend, as that individual characteristic once again defines her leadership, Milly Farrier (Nico Parker). Again, we tell people about her love for science. She owns a chemistry set (which she never uses) and makes a little bit of animal training – the last of which is constantly directed to her as “using & # 39”. the scientific method ”or“ rules of science, ”although it has no obvious connection to the field.

There is no doubt that these characteristics are deliberately good, but there are intentions between good intentions and impact on outcomes. Science is nothing more than a dress for Clara, Belle, and Milly. Their individual interest does not inform their growth. Instead, each of the three films is preset to the same broad thematic arc for not suspecting yourself. And yet, the leader's interest in science is so demanding early in every story, that the extent to which they are not ultimately a factor for the collection is rare.

At worst, science feels almost like a last minute character addition. The script for Dumbo tells us that Milly loves science, but she has to turn herself into pretzels to hide the fact that her ultimate purpose is not unique, but to facilitate flight Dumbo – do not need a scientific investigation at all on it. If anything, the film could have made Dumbo's gift and Milly's scientific thinking a source of friction. No luck of this kind.

I keep some hope for future female leaders with elegance for science. The Disney movies that don't fall short in this connection are the ones where that love has been integrated naturally and related to it, rather than To use it as a prop – but also, to allow it, they've adapted from a source material that's not Disney. A Wrinkle in Time a Black Panther both include young women interested in science and technology: Meg Murry (Storm Reid) and Shuri (Letitia Wright). Their passion makes a dramatic impact on the problems we face.


Black Panther - Tâlla and Shuri in his lab

Tâlla (Chadwick Boseman) and Shuri (Letitia Wright) in her laboratory.
Marvel Studios / Walt Disney Staltios

Meg's parents are scientists, and she literally has to follow in her father's footsteps to find him. Shuri's interest in and technology for technology is just as personal as our integral responsibilities as a princess. In Black PantherThe car's large sequence, running the vehicle remotely, works in real time to keep the technology (and the car) from breaking down.

In contrast, Disney uses clever books and curiosity rather than women's independence in the same way that proficiency in martial arts or leather jacket once showed that female characters were “difficult” and “cool.” They are; ■ signs or visual features are not traditionally considered “girly,” but they are also only surface level indicators. Milly quotes Marie Curie as a role model several times, but there is no explanation of her identity or why it is so significant to Milly as a scientific hero, beyond a diorama where Curie is the only woman in a room. full of men. The film takes advantage of the way in which the science field was previously considered unsuitable for women as a shorthand for how her young heroine goes against the grain, but she doesn't give any emphasis on the real work that women did.

Changing character in thoughtful and valuable ways is not impossible, but it cannot be done for lip. Cinderella a Approvalfor example, he revisited and revived well-known characters by putting the flesh out of the existing material (and a complete background, in the latter case) rather than “updating” these characters in a way that Ironically, it contradicts that it contradicts itself directly with the Message “you're enough” that these movies are supposed to send.

In short, the big thing that these young girls learn is that they are more than good enough as they are. Their shiny new interests suggest that someone thinks otherwise, but eventually experience the point: To paraphrase Annie Lennox and Aretha Franklin, sisters must do it for themselves, t not to continue appearances with others.


Source link