Higher power, the unpredictable mountains, the residual risk! The explanations of the Crans-Montana avant-garde play are readily available. But they're wrong: skiers can expect 100 per cent safety on open bist.
For every shooter, every snowboarder, here is the most of all horror videos: a throw shot over the slopes! On Tuesday at 14.23 the clock was out of fear of reality. Huge masses of snow are shooting four people under the Plaine Morte mountain station at Crans-Montana VS. All are rescued, but Pistenpatrouur's 34-year-old dies later in hospital.
The shock in Valais, across the country is deep.
It would be wrong to look first for a trap or even to ask for a new law, as politicians like doing unfortunately. However, even more embarrassing, however, is unfortunately still under the heading "residual risk".
Tourism Director Crans-Montana VS said the day after the "NZZ" disaster: "Zero risk does not exist in outdoor activities and will never exist." The cable manager has a cable cable: "There is always a residual risk." Media spokesman in the Valais Canton police: «In the mountains there is no absolute certainty.»
So there is only a higher power in the game, unpredictably the mountains, the risk of remordy called by prayer mills?
Who is being dropped off the slopes is – without any doubt – blame yourself. But anyone on a winter sports destination is open on the road, he must be able to rely on 100 percent that has not been swallowed at a disadvantage – 99.99 percent safety is not safe! No-one can claim residual risk. If there is a residual risk in fact, the slope may not simply be opened. What else do we have for snow and wind stations, weather forecasts and security heads who know the area and interpret the data?
Art Furrer (81) is one of the few that presses to critically open. In the "Aargauer Zeitung" the legendary mountain leader said how the Crans-Montana disaster could be avoided: "If in doubt, you always have to lock the slopes. It's taking a ski guide local who have courage and say: I'm locked – regardless of commercial interests and customer requirements. "
In many previous cases, the Federal Court came to the same conclusion: Only slopes can be opened if the security has guaranteed it completely.
Now Valais's central public prosecutor started an investigation. The Eira and Avalanche Research (SLF) Institute was commissioned to give an opinion – although an expert from the same organization has already announced the remaining risk theory in the SYLWAD: "In general, ski slopes are available Protect them from aviation. But you never get the absolute certainty that avalanche will never come down there. "
After all, who warned Crans-Montana against "moderate risk avalanche" on Tuesday? Also the SLF!
Therefore, examples that have to provide security, even to what they think they have no protection: the residual risk!