Researcher He Jianku said about his "attempt" – on YouTube. He claimed that he had changed the legacy of a newborn couple, Lulu and Nana. With the help of a called crystalline technology called this, the researcher should have changed the legacy so that the children are resistant to HIV, that is, the virus that causes AIDS.
You are now reading one of you free articles on GP.se
"I understand that my work will be questioned, but I believe that this technology needs families and I'm ready to have a criticism about this," said Reuters.
Changing the human genome is artificial and allows embryo to evolve to evolve into an extremely controversial and excluded person in the vast majority of countries. As long as you know, it has never happened from before.
He Jianku's research criticism did not allow us to stay.
"If this is the case, this is the most irresponsible, immoral and dangerous use of the technology (this) technology," said Kathy Niakan, a specialist at the Francis Crick Foundation in London.
The research institution is related to it, The University of Southern Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China, states that the researcher had been on unpaid leave since February and is not expected to return until 2021. And # 39 ; The University also alleged that the investigator's efforts were not known.
"The University of Southern Science and Technology requires scientific research to comply with national laws and regulations, and to respect and comply with international ethical standards," the university writes in a statement.
Chinese authorities say they have started an investigation, while the researcher himself has appeared to have disappeared or become unpleasant.
Prior to that, he contacted the Reuters news agency, and said he intended to share his research during this week's scientific forum, and intended to allow the research to have the peer review before, to publish in a scientific journal.
At the moment, however, no-one knows if He Jianku has done what he allegedly has done. There are still many question marks.
Nils-Eric Sahlin, a medical ethics professor at Lund University, is not surprising at the news.
– – The technology is there and is interested in using it. But before using it, the global community must agree that it is safe to use, because today you do not know what the results are. There is a moral attitude to the extent to which something that these children can live with them throughout their lives.
TT: But then was the child first test tube?
– – Yes, but this requires you to carry out a thorough moral analysis first and study what the results can be. But above all, not all of us, not just the science community, discuss what values should be relevant in Sweden. How do we want to do with this technology? As it is today, this is not allowed in Sweden, while the technology has huge potential. We have noted this long and Smer (the National Medical Council) has offered a parliamentary inquiry. We have to discuss this – now, says Nils-Eric Sahlin.