Saturday , July 2 2022

The last debate: The Polygraph, the vests-de-forces and the poll that nobody (almost) wants to appreciate The European Union 2019



[ad_1]

The candidates leading the lists for which PS, PSD, UDP, CDS and BE are competing for the European elections on 26 May hold part of the day this Monday to prepare for the debate in RTP1, which takes place in the final part of the campaign. For a few hours they paused the street acts and studied the European themes and did media training. They were no longer on the street when the CESOP survey for the Public and the RTP were known, where Socialists reached 33% of the valid votes, against 23% of the PSD. .

The topic of the elections was not discussed at the start of the debate, it was broadcast live from Thalia Theater in Lisbon. First, candidates were presented with a round of questions. Nuno Melo (CDS) was asked whether it was a relief to vote without the PSD, contrary to what happened in 2014. He spoke on the subject without responding directly. "It's not about relief, it's about being proud to be head of my party's list," he said, adding that he prefers to be complete. Paulo Rangel (PSD) also rejected any embarrassment, but said it was not a relief.


Pedro Marques (PS) was asked a question about restoring Carlos Moedas. "It's a question that doesn't rise," he said, favoring drawing attention to the presidency of the European Commission, which is also being discussed at this election event. Carlos Moedas said that he had only worked with him in Government. "And I worked just like him." He then called for the strengthening of votes in the PS so that the party was in a position to influence the choices in the EU, namely at the level of commissioners.

At the start of the debate, João Ferreira (UDP) and Marisa Matias acknowledged the benefits of the parties they represent in influencing governance. The communist assured that "the decisive role that the PCP wants to the Greens" in the new era of the national political path "weighs" on voters' appreciation. "It's beneficial. T [para a minha candidatura], certainly, "he said the block.

Maria Flor Pedroso, director of the RTP who moderated the debate also gave the candidates the opportunity to consider the 30 years of integration within the EU. Paulo Rangel ensured that “the European experience was a positive experience” and referred to the issue of accessibility, amongst others. "There is a pre-and post-EU Portugal," coming to the conclusion that Rangel.Joao Ferreira insists on taking a negative balance on political sub-politics, but for journalists it began, as a positive attitude, on people's movement ( including students). Pedro Marques made a long list of benefits, from the rights of the people, to the rights of people, access to women.


On the negative side, the Socialists focused on how the EU was responding to the economic and financial crisis, particularly in southern European countries. "He has intensified the inequalities in the countries themselves," he said, adding that Portugal needs to "resume the convergence process." Social-Democrat, Paulo Rangel, chose to regret the losses that had not been recovered in the marine and fisheries sector and spoke about some euro defects. "We have not been able to complete the banking union and this is a negative thing," he said. For the block candidate, one of the most negative dimensions in the EU is the fact that the euro has created inequalities between countries. Marisa Matias also criticized the EU's use of the "financial elites" and regretted that the European Union had not given a decent response to the refugee disaster. The head of the CDS list chose as negative points "the extremes that rise" and "terrorism", for example.

After the first half hour of discussion, Paulo Rangel asks to speak and complain that they don't let him speak, as has already happened in other debates. When it can interfere with the end, it is noted that "credibility problem" is Pedro Marques's speech and accuses the PS candidate of being "denied six times by the Polygraph". [site de verificação de notícias] in recent weeks. "

The cycle resumes the balance of the worst that the EU has brought to Portugal so that João Ferreira can explain his vision and that the candidate discusses the negative effects of Europe on industry, agriculture and fisheries. "The euro 20 years ago has exacerbated all this," he concluded, "We are among the least developed countries in the world." The communist also said that we could not choose the next crisis to determine whether we chose the money or the people "We must release ourselves from these forces."

The vote was the final theme before the break. Marisa Matias began responding to comments on the election of two deputies, attributed to the Left Block, which would become the third political force. "The people are actually in the votes. We did our job and the rest was up to people," he said. Nuno Melo insisted that the "CDS was a live test that the surveys were wrong" and stressed that his party was the only alternative. João Ferreira already said he felt very confident about the UDP campaign. "We are not viewers, we are building an outcome," he said, recognizing that the important thing is to elect the 21 deputies. According to the survey, the UDP and CDS received 8% of the voting intentions (2 deputies).


In turn, Pedro Marques did not make great references to the vote, giving eight or nine MEPs (with 33% of the intentions to vote), and chose to respond to Paulo Rangel on the Polygraph , regretting the Social Democrats have brought a subject of this kind to this debate. Rangel said he felt "great confidence in the field" and the result, respected the Portuguese confidence, but once again said "Pedro Marques is the champion of handling the news."

[ad_2]
Source link