The first week of Imelda Marcos's first first conviction for graft was likely to pass without being arrested, as Sandiganbayan "deferred" issued a warrant because pled for his consent to proceed to appeal.
In a text message on Tuesday night, President of Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang said that the Fifth Division of the court would be the first on November 16, a hearing on the proposal "Imelda for leaving court to benefit [herself] of post-disclosure medications. "The motion was dated November 12.
If the court decides to release the arrest order, it can only occur after the hearing.
Sandiganbayan found on December 9, the 89-year-old widow of Ferdinand Marcos dictator was guilty in seven craft cases filed against him between 1991 and 1995 in connection with Swiss foundations, which established her & It was a man who was used to stash more than $ 200 million abroad while serving as a governing officer.
77 years in prison
Marcos's secret deposits had been beaten to $ 680 million by the time the dictator was removed from power in 1986.
The court sentenced Marcos to a prison term between six and 11 years for each of the seven counts for breach of the Anti-Craft and Law Exercise Act.
The charges are reliable, but authorities have not moved to arrest Marcos in the absence of a warrant, criticizing a double standard criticism for the first wife.
Its offer for leaving is reasons provided for by Rule 120 of the Court Rules in cases where the court finds the accused's absence in issuing the award to be " without cause of justification ".
Marcos did not have a previous lawyer, Robert A.C. Sison, appeared during a November 9 hearing, and said the antigraft court "seems to be unjust."
As a legal result, she "loses medicines" after conviction and court "will be ordered [her] arrest. "
The proposal to be left – filed by its new lawyer, before the Government Corporate Counsel, Manuel Lazaro – would try to justify Marcos's absence so that you could file an appeal and stop her arrest.
Some solicitors have questioned why the warranty was not given immediately.
The law professor of the University of Philippines, Theodore Te, said that there were specific consequences under the Court Rules, and one of them said that the court must order it to be arrested. "
Justice protection system
Sen broke Panason Lacson and allegedly warranted a warrant against Marcos, saying he says another story of a growing privilege on the justice system.
"[If] he was Juan or the ordinary Juana de la Cruz without access to busy lawyers, he or she would have been brought to prison after conviction and when awaiting an appeal, "he said in a text message.
But Lacson acknowledged that the due process must be observed in the case of Marcos or anyone else.
Bail is still possible
The President of Justice of Justice said the court could continue to allow Marcos to post a bail when appealed to the ruling – depending on its ruling on its offer.
Tang's statement was in response to online misleading reports that announced that Marcos's bail was forfeited. " – With a report by DJ Yap
Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to access The Philippine Daily Enquirer and other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as soon as 4am and share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.
For feedback, complaints or queries, please contact us.