Monday , April 12 2021

Carl I. Hagen was strongly motivated – Three voting against a full crisis – "general assault" against KrF



– It was a general opposite! They say they want to be a partner in the future, and they do something like that, "said Carl I. Hagen to Dagbladet, the party's party actor when the Party Progress group meeting was over hour over overtime hours on Tuesday.

RASERI: Carl I. Hagen was not alone in being fierce at KrF during the Frps group meeting. Photo: Christian Roth Christensen
Fury: Carl I. Hagen was not alone in being fierce at KrF during the Frps group meeting. Photo: Christian Roth Christensen
Show more

The garden was not alone in being fierce in KrF, as if it could go to the government soon. The sources of the newspaper state that the budget agreement – as used in normal cases, is usually approved by an overwhelming majority – has been adopted with three votes overweight. The votes were 12-9 at the heating group meeting.

Alert KrF

It was supposed to be a joyful enjoyment when the Right, the Frp, the Left and the KrF were on Tuesday 21st March to present the sixth consensus on a state budget in the same number of years.

ALSO: First hour of overtime - after internal blowing at Frp - the conference could be started to the press. Here is Høyres Henrik Asheim, Krj Kjell Ingolf Ropstad, Venstres Abid Raja and Frps Helge A. Njåstad at the end. Photo: Christian Roth Christensen
GORAMSER: Only one hour overtime – after internal blowing at Frp – the conference could be started to the press. Here is Høyres Henrik Asheim, Krj Kjell Ingolf Ropstad, Venstres Abid Raja and Frps Helge A. Njåstad at the end. Photo: Christian Roth Christensen
Show more

However, the time went in and approached 22. Of the four partners, who in a short period of time could be a majority government, only three were represented with consultants and parliamentary representatives at the water court in the Storting. Only after a few minutes, Helge André Njåstad, the finance spokesman of the Progress, dropped the stairs from the party's meeting room on the fourth floor.

During the press conference at the water hall, which would otherwise be a wonderful issue, Njåstad had the following message to deputy Krf Kjell Ingolf Ropstad and the rest of his party:

"We can not continue to work together like that!

Free Cut Duty

The mood is mainly due to something that happened in the main hall a few hours in advance. In parallel with the budgetary discussions in the survey, KrF chose to vote for a bid to reverse a large free Frp tax victory from 2014.

He was in contact with a representative proposal from KrF regarding the "decision of offense and offense".

First, KrF suggested that the government should "reverse the evaluation" of the change, which meant that customers could buy up to six bottle of wine if they did not use the tobacco quota.

But then Ap came with the proposal to reverse the whole plan. Initially, this should take place from 2019, but when the date came into place on January 1, 2020, KrF chose to vote for it.

– We are not in government yet, and then we run the KrF policy. He would be missing only, deputy KrF Olaug Bollestad said to NRK afterwards.

– You can not catch that road

During the press conference in the water court on Tuesday, Kjell Ingolf Ropstad defended the vote by noting that KrF in his time disagreed with the tax-free change.

But the explanation helps a little in the mood of Frp.

YES NO: - We can not continue that, says Frps Helge André Njåstad. Photo: Christian Roth Christensen
YES NO: "We can not continue that," said Frp Helge André Njåstad. Photo: Christian Roth Christensen
Show more

"We sit in a room and negotiate with KrF on the state budget, while KrF went to the Party Party, SV and the Labor Party to form a majority in a case against something we had – we could not catch that, "said Njåstad to Dagbladet.

"Should we co-operate, we can not get rid of at the same time as we agree," it's going on.

– Are you looking forward to working with KrF in government?

"I am looking forward to implementing a Frp policy every day. It's about us. If we get it, we will do that. But we do not work with KrF to get over and implement policy KrF.

More about the chewing

The great dissatisfaction with the budget agreement in the Frp parliamentary committee on Tuesday is not due solely to free CrF tax fines. The removal of the 350 dollar limit for non-VAT e-commerce is another zero of victory before Frp.

"We're tired of having always taken our cases," said source in the Frp parliamentary group to Dagbladet.

That cut to support the Human Rights Service will not be recovered in the state budget for next year, but rather it will fall under the budget of the new year – proves at Frp. The same is the increase in tax stage.

– Cnocio i

As well as the dissatisfaction with single elements in the budget agreement and changes in the tax quota, there are many MPs responding to KrF's talk for their party. Noting whether he split the Hagens description of a general assault at the group's meeting, Helge André Njåstad answers:

– I do not refer to internal meetings. But it is not surprising that what we saw in this reduction made something about us. KrF has recorded a negative minute minute because we think of people at various meetings of county councils. We've strolled in front of the TV and have heard a lot about the Progress Party that does not match.

"We're clear to KrF: You can not mention much that you have to work with that," it's going on.

listen to opinions

Njåstad believes that the forefront of the Frp in the budget for next year is the absence of a salutation fee as it is called – that is, a fee to fund new investments.

Budget budgets have received many earlier references for such fees, such as the luggage fee, flight fee and last year's 83 per cent increase in the sugar fee.

KrFs Kjell, Ingolf Ropstad, who is about to start working on government issues on behalf of his party, will raise the amount of children's allowance, the one-time salary and the least pension that is an important victory. Also, in terms of reversing the regulatory changes that opened for the removal of 700 Line Line workers, KrF has had an analysis – such as Frp.

The strong warnings from Frp he has the following to say about:

"We believe that the expansion of four to six bottle of wine is too much, so we voted against this in 2014 and in line with our own policies today. But it is important that we speak well and I realize that what has happened today is asking for the Progress Party.

Like Dagbladet on Facebook


Source link