Tuesday , August 16 2022

NGOs are dissatisfied with the MoW’s style of work and communication – Opinion – News


On Monday, a signed letter from 15 leading non-governmental organizations in social services was sent to Welfare Minister Ramon Petraviča (KPV LV) and the Secretary of State for the Ministry of Welfare, as well as to Prime Minister Krišjānis Kariņš (JV).

These organizations include the Latvian Social Workers Association, the Latvian Civic Social Services Managers Association, the Latvian Orphan Association, “Module C Organization”, the Latvian Samaritan Association, the SOS Latvian Children’s Village Association, the “Social Support and Education Foundation” and the “Foundation Total Foundation”. “.

Such a view is also expressed by the “Wings of Hope” society, the “Nepaliec viens” association, “Dardedze Centrs”, the “Rīgas pilsētas” Rūpju bērns “” association, “Centrs Marta”, the Resource Center for People with Mental Disabilities “Zelda” and society “Latvijas Kustība for an independent life”.

The ministry is accused of delaying the advancement of strategic decisions and failing to engage the industry in controversial situations. At the same time, dissatisfaction was expressed with the lack of involvement of industry organizations in key decision making.

Although organizations do not deny the existence of communication platforms, such as the Social Services Development Council, the Social Workers Cooperation Council and working groups, they point to that

cooperation in them is often formal, moreover, the actions of the MoW managers have repeatedly been undemocratic and incompatible with good governance.

Industry organizations are also critical of MoW management’s ability to protect the interests of the socially disadvantaged and those working in the industry.

Therefore, the institutions emphasize that the last event that aroused the anger of social work experts and industry organizations was the Ministry of Finance and Welfare’s intention to force urban social services to perform a new role – assessing the situation of the self-employed and providing proof of ceasing paid minimum social security contributions. .

This proposal, which has now been withdrawn, was only the culmination of a long and gradual process of growing dissatisfaction, and not the only cause of dissatisfaction.

Looking at the history of the last 10 – 15 years, organizations have discovered that

The MoW has been unable to protect the interests of the socially vulnerable population and the most important stakeholders in the industry.

This is also confirmed by a number of processes for which the Ministry of Welfare is responsible. The organizations point out that the number of social work specialists has never been in line with the requirements of the Law on Social Services and Social Support. At the same time, the social services sector has been working at the capability limit for a long time and has been significantly weakened, the organization notes.

In their view, there is a catastrophic shortage of social workers and other social work specialists in Latvia. This problem is facing almost every municipality and every social service provider.

Of those who graduate, only a small number work in their profession because of low pay, prestige in the profession, inadequate workload and other reasons, the letter said. There is also a shortage of social work educators, as there are not many state budget places in social work programs at universities, but the highest number of clients has not been specified for some social services. As organizations anticipate,

if the issue of human resource capacity is not addressed, there will be a complete crisis in social workers in five to ten years time.

Source link