Tuesday , August 3 2021

Smoking Causes 90% of All Lung Cancer Deaths



Smoking Causes 90% of All Lung Cancer Deaths

Smoking Causes 90% of All Lung Cancer Deaths

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, lung cancer is the main cancer killer among men and women in the United States. The main cause of lung cancer is smoking. It contributes to up to 90 percent of all lung cancer deaths.

Andrea Villanti, PhD, MPH, tells us about lung cancer and smoking – and much more. Villanti is a link teacher in Psychiatry and Psychology Departments at the University of Vermont. He specializes in understanding the use of tobacco, including predictors and patterns of tobacco use in young people, as well as how to improve tobacco control policy and make program decisions, including tobacco regulation science.

Read or listen to the interview below:

Villanti: 600 ingredients have shapes, and when they are burned, they create more than 7,000 chemicals. It is known that at least 69 of these chemicals cause cancer and many are toxic.

So, when a smoker breathes the lung into the lungs, they give these chemicals in direct contact with their lung cells, and # 39 ; r cells are damaged by those chemicals. The chemicals also enter blood flow, which is why they cause disease in other parts of your body.

We also see this with a second hand smoke exposure. That is why some people who have never smoked develop lung cancer as a result of being exposed to someone in their home or in their smoking environment.

Villanti: In the United States, cigarette smoking is responsible for more than 480,000 deaths each year. That's more than 1,300 deaths a day.

In Vermont, tobacco is one of the three behaviors that contribute to the four diseases that cause more than 50 per cent of all deaths in our state. In Vermont, we expect about 390 deaths in 2018 as a result of lung cancer.

When we are thinking of cancer more generally, cigarette smoking accounts for almost 20 percent of new cancer cases in the United States and 30 percent of cancer deaths. That is 1 in 5 new cancer cases and almost 1 in 3 cancer deaths.

Villanti: I have recently heard that the main public health epidemic opioids of tobacco was a public health epidemic of 20 years ago.

The problem is that the tobacco epidemic continues. Its effect on deaths in our state is still much higher than the number of opioid-related deaths. If we look at cancer deaths alone, smoking was responsible for more than four times the number of deaths compared to opioids in 2016. If we are thinking of other effects of smoking, such as the effect of smoking on deaths related to the disease heart, that number jumps to eight times the number of deaths compared to opioid-related deaths.

We can not forget about tobacco, but we can not continue to see these epidemics in terms of tobacco and the use of opioids and substances independently. Tobacco use is closely related to alcohol and drug use, both of which have significant effects on the health of Vermonters and in the US more widely.

Villanti: There are two ways in which we can reduce the use of tobacco in the community. The first is to stop people starting to use in the first place, and secondly it is to help tobacco users give it up.

The work I focus on young and young adults is because we can have the greatest impact on the health of the population if we do both that of young people. Smokers die about 10 years earlier than no smokers, so if we can get youngsters to give them the best before they turn 35, their experience and survival looks like smoking never. They get the 10 years of life back.

Better yet, if we can stop young people from using tobacco, we can avoid long-term health outcomes and medical related smoking costs. In Vermont, the healthcare costs of a smoker are over $ 200,000. In fact, we have the 11th highest healthcare costs per smoker in the country, so restraint needs to be a key part of a strategy to reduce those health-related costs and also to improve people's health and life expectancy.

We have strong evidence for basing our interventions and policies, and we know that the most effective approach to reducing smoking is a comprehensive approach. That includes a number of things, such as setting up smoke-free and non-tobacco policies, and we've done this nice work in Vermont where we need bars, restaurants, work sites and smoke-free hospitals, where we exclude tobacco and e-cigarette use on public school land and in school-sponsored functions, in licensed childcare facilities.

We ban smoking in motor vehicles that are occupied by children to reduce exposure to second-hand smoke. We do well there.

We can also increase the price of tobacco products unit, for example, the cost of a pack of cigarettes, and we usually do it through taxes. Studies show repeatedly that increasing the price of tobacco products tackles smoking prevention and helps people to give it up. Higher prices on cigarettes convince some people to give it up completely, giving others the best to become regular smokers, and to ignore pre-smokers from starting again.

When we restrict tobacco use in public places and we increase the cost, we also need to provide a ramp for tobacco users, and that happens by supporting supportive policies and services. The Vermont Health Department runs 802quits.org, which provides free online counseling, personally, and by phone, as well as providing free nicotine replacement therapy such as gum, nappies and hedgerows for adult tobacco users . Vermont has also expanded the benefits of Medicaid to support counseling to give tobacco optimum. The reason why adult donation is important for youth prevention is also when you get parents to give up the cessation, especially when their children are young, you reduce the likelihood that their children will smoke.

Villanti: There are many. One of them applies to a state, where we have been discussing increasing the age of selling tobacco products up to the age of 21. At Vermont you have to be 18 years old to buy cigarettes, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, hookahs, tobacco-free tobacco, such as pouring and snuff, but we're starting to stimulate behind & # 39; n neighbors and other parts of the country in that area. There are now over 360 cities and counties and 22 indicate that they have raised the minimum age of selling tobacco products to 21. We have been offered here and we have not yet enacted it.

One of the main challenges we see to this policy is that there is a debate that young adults gain a number of legal rights at age 18. They can vote, they can join the military. They should be able to make choice, choose an adult, to use tobacco products. And there are two pieces of evidence against this debate that I find it more compelling. First of all, we see changes in tobacco use trends in the United States, so that start starts later, and we see more young adults start where we would just see young people in start smoking We now see that the start-up age of smoking creeps up.

Secondly, the adolescent brain does not reach maturity up to about 25 years. And most importantly, part of the brain that is managing decision-making and self-regulation is one of the last parts to develop. So, when I talk to dependent young young smokers, they say they wished they had never started. They say they did not know what they got when they started. The idea that smoking is a personal choice is not really true for young people, especially when we talk about addictive substance such as nicotine.

Villanti: The term "e-cigarettes" covers a wide variety of products such as burns or mushrooms or woods or JUUL. Some look like cigarettes, some look like machines, and some look like USB drives. The common factor is that they heat nicotine solution to the place where it turns into aerosol and can be breathed, but the devices are different in the efficiency they are Provide nicotine and are different in concentrating and nicotine flavors in the fluids.

The nicotine way is provided, the likely exposure to nicotine and other chemicals is different from all these factors, and it is hard to be able to assess the impact of an e-cigarette unless you talk about a specific device.

Now, this is different from cigarettes, which have been so engineered to produce a constant experience for smokers that the nicotine level, the taste, the time taken for you to smoke a cigarette is about the same, and we can have a better estimate of exposure to that product and how it affects health.

At a population level and at an individual level, there are potential benefits and potential harm to using e-cigarettes. If adult smokers changed completely to e-cigarettes, current evidence suggests that there would be significant reductions in tobacco death and disease. However, the e-cigarettes may appeal to youth and addict to a new generation of nicotine users at risk, especially if that nicotine uses transformations of e- cigarettes for cigarette use or other use of burnable products.

Villanti: Nicotine is a powerful addictive drug, and smoking is specially tight to cope with many daily strains.

When I talk to young young smokers, I can hear how much they have given the best to use other substances. They have given the best to alcohol, marijuana, they have given heroin the best, but they do not know how they would deal if they give up the best of smoking. Cigarettes fill so many roles for people. They provide a break of work, of stress. They help to determine structure during someone's day and organization. They serve a role in alleviating social situations and tackling anxiety, but the problem that is not just the problem.

Cigarettes have done a great job to market an attractive and attractive image of smoking, which highlights how smoking represents confidence or rebellion or rebellion or youth, whatever it is. work to sell the product. And let me be clear that the notable aim of these companies is to create lifelong users. They attract young people to their products because it will earn them the greatest profit.

They also have tremendous political power. In the 1990's, the main cigarettes were responsible for racketeering for encompassing the fact that nicotine is addictive, their products kill people, and have long known this. No other product that is used, as intended, kills half its users. If this was a meat or lettuce that made people ill, it would be pulled away from grocery shop shelves, but we have known more than 50 years that cigarettes cause lung cancer and now a range of other diseases, and continue on the unfinished market.

Villanti: I will tell you, when I was seven years old, my grandmother had lung cancer lungs and she only gave her a diagnosis best to smoke He died from brain cancer when I was 10. I do this because she and thousands of people like her will die from smoking – for a death that can be stopped.

We have discussed many policy options that can help people give up smoking and reduce tobacco use, and I want to emphasize that doing all that with each other is more effective than make any one interference only. The most successful programs we've seen have used a comprehensive strategy with all of those methods to reduce smoking.

One of the best things you can do for your health is to not start smoking, not start using tobacco, and if you have started, to give it up. When people ask me how to give them the best to smoke or what they can do, I'll tell you that you have to throw the kitchen sink on it. It's not just one thing. Use exit lines, advise, medication, get support from friends and family, and above all, be prepared to try even if you're slipping. It is hard to give tobacco use, but they all try to count.

CONTENTS CONTINUED

The Deadliest Cancer: Lung Cancer Accounts for 27% of Cancer Related Deaths

Smoking Cessation: Strategies to help you give it up to date


Source link