Asserting a response from the Congress party, the Prime Minister said that the Congress ally wanted to turn the clock back to 1953 when there was a separate prime minister for the state of Jammu and Kashmir.
"One of the major leagues of Congress – a powerful mahagathbandhan member – the National Conference has said there should be a separate prime minister in Kashmir. You're telling me, do you agree with & # 39 of this call of the ally of Congress? he said the PM.
The Prime Minister further added that the Congress party was liable for a solution to how its ally might plot enough courage to raise an application of such kind.
PM: C ok d o w iche iche ge ge ge ge 1953 1953 1953 gold gold gold 1953 1953 1953 1953 1953
– ANI (@ANI) 1554125127000
Earlier, the National Conference leader said Kashmir became part of the Indian Union on the basis "that he would have his own identity, his own composition".
Addressing a public assembly in Bandipora J & K, the former prime minister said, "A state of the princes united with the state without a state but we said we will have our own identity, our Our own constitution. -Riyasat (President) 'Wazir-e-Azam (Prime Minister)' too. Through the grace of God, we will bring that back. '
Following the attention of the Prime Minister, the CC leader reaffirmed his stall, saying that his party had always stood for the recovery of the terms of the reception which Maharaja Hari Singh discussed for J&K in 1947. He also asked to The Congress and other opposition parties "do not hesitate to distort it from its attention. T
"Don't hesitate as long as I am together from my speech today. In fact, call Bluff Modi by doing just that," he said.
Dear friends in Congress and other opposition parties. Don't hesitate as far as you can from me… https://t.co/6iiOrgui7l
– Omar Abdullah (@OmarAbdullah) 1554126807000
Abdullah, speaking to reporters after the address in Bandipora, also warned that any interference with the special status of Jammu and Kashmir, in particular, Article 370 and 35A of the Constitution, will result in a reconsideration of the state's relationship with the nation.
"They are talking about removing Article 35 A. When they did not hear about 35A, what would they remove? As long as we get rid of that, we don't let that happen,"
Omar He said.
"We made a promise to this state and the people of the state. There is no time limit for that promise. We were not told that this was for 10 years or 20 years. We were told that Jammu and Kashmir remained part of This country, the state will continue to enjoy special status, "he went on to say.
The former prime minister added, "Obviously, what will our relationship with this country be if you delete that special status? Our relationship is on that basis. You are talking for removing Article 370 and Article 35 A, then you will have to talk about this (reconsidering Jammu-Kashmir's relationship with India) as well. "
Article 370 of the Constitution gives Jammu and Kashmir special autonomous status, while Article 35 (A) gives the citizens of the state special rights and privileges.
#WATCH Omar Abdullah in Bandipora says, "Baaki riyasat bina shart kert kein ap, https://t.co/ehLRDGEV7C
– ANI (@ANI) 1554121188000
Abdullah's comment came to an end on PDP leader Mehbooba Mufti's seal on Sunday when he had warned that the relationship between the state and the union would be over if Article 370 of the Constitution was dissolved.
Going back to finance minister, Arun Jaitley, about advocating the abolition of Jammu and Kashmir's special status, Mufti said, "Jaitley must understand this. It's not easy to say. If you & # 39 Scrapping (Article) 370, your relationship with J&K will be over. "
Mehbooba said that Article 370 was a bridge between the Union and the state and if the special provision of the Constitution was revoked, then New Delhi would have to "re-negotiate" its relationship with Jammu and Kashmir.
Read this story in Marathi