Friday , December 4 2020

A new condemnation against Monsanto about cancer-related glyphosate

The ruling is the latest in a series of judicial attacks that Monsanto has suffered from this herbicide, although the company insists that it is not carcinogenic.

There are more than 13,000 legal cases associated with the herbicide started in the United States.AFP

A California jury on Monday condemned Monsanto, owned by German company Bayer, to pay more than 2 billion dollars to a couple of Americans suffering from cancer they are attributed to the Roundup herbicide, to inform the complainants of the complainants.

The ruling is the latest in a series of judicial attacks that Monsanto has suffered for this herbicide made with glyphosate, although the company insists that it is not carcinogenic.

The legal team of the marriage, which denied Monsanto in Oakland's court (west), described the outcome of the trial as "historical."

To that indemnity of 2,000 million dollars -1,000 million per person – another 55 million is also added to Alberta and Alva Pilliod as compensation for economic losses, moral damage, and so on.

"The jury saw for himself the internal documents of the company that showed, from the first day, that Monsanto had never been interested in discovering whether Roundup was safe," said attorney Brent Wisner, plaintiffs.

"Instead of investing in sound science, they invested millions in attacking the science that threatened their trade agenda," he added.

In a statement, Bayer was "disappointed" by that ruling and announced his intention to appeal, arguing that it was different from a recent review of the US Environment Protection Agency on herbicides based on glyphosate. .

"The consensus among the main health regulators worldwide is that products based on glyphosate can be used safely and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic," Bayer said.

The judgment is the company's third judicial defect on this matter.

The trial started at the end of March, just after Monsanto had been convicted, for the same reasons, of paying 80 million dollars to septuagenarian with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that was blamed on Roundup.

Again, the jury was of the view that Monsanto should have warned about the possible dangers of his flagship product.

In August 2018, Monsanto was ordered to pay $ 289 million to a gardener affected by the same type of cancer, a sum later reduced to 78 million by a judge.

"Unlike two Monsanto's first trials, where the judges severely restricted the amount of evidence from the plaintiffs, we were of the end getting shown to the mountain jury of evidence that shows science treatment, the media t and Monsanto's regulatory agencies to maintain its own agenda despite the serious damage in Roundup to the animal kingdom and the humanity, "said attorney Michael Miller, Wisner's partner.

Bayer announced last month that more than 13,000 legal cases involving the herbicide had been filed in the United States.

Source link