Monday , October 3 2022

Who will lead on Electricity Options, Electricity Crossovers, Semi Electric Trucks, and Solar Doors?



[ad_1]

Cars

Published on December 2nd, 2018
by Zachary Shahan

December 2nd, 2018 no Zachary Shahan


There is a lot of excitement in the world of electric vehicles nowadays. Tesla has come on and shows that you can generate an electric-market car that runs number 1 in its class (from a distance) and even runs in the top 5 of each car model. This has created excitement for new boundaries – electric crossings, electric trucks, electric trucks, etc.

There are a handful of electrical installations that we are very excited about – or at least we are interested in them – and we are eager to hear more about electric models that some large automakers have suggested or shown even and reveal names about them.

But let's be honest: there is one maker offering the biggest pledge in terms of electricity options, electric crossovers, and electricity flows.

Yes, we will have models in every class by a variety of makers, and industry needs variety. Yes, different features, pricing and styling are still important in all of these classes. But Tesla Model 3 is clearly an electric car champion, although tens of thousands of users find it more sensible to buy Nissan LEAF, Chevy Bolt, BMW i3, Fiat 500e, Toyota Prius Prime, Kia Soul EV, Hyundai Ioniq EV, Volkswagen e -Golf, etc.

Yes, cars are not cars, cars are not cars, and cars are not semi-car cars. Having said that, here's the tremendous success story that has come from the basic battery leadership, electrical leadership, software leadership, great studio, and the reputation of the company that made the Model 3. All those strengths can be transferred to other classes. Unfortunately, what is important is that I do not see any other company that competes with Tesla on it any of these issues, let alone all of them.

Batteries: Who can compete with Tesla + Panasonic on batteries? Seriously. I'm going around the world giving presentations on electric vehicles, interviewing experts who know much more about me, and moderate panel discussions with industry leaders, and I'm even coming Find someone who even tries to convince me that another company is leading on batteries. LG Chem, CATL, Samsung SDI, SK Innovation, and others are making progress. They follow strong industry trends about cost, chemistry, performance and production capacity, but they all slide below Tesla + Panasonic of what I can say.

Fish: It's not just the batteries. Tesla has pioneered motors, fuses, inverters, etc. Something that is often mentioned in passing but with little thought or discussion is the relevance of Tesla's extensive vertical integration to success. The company plans the components of its cattle animals to fit smoothly, smoothly and powerful. Wherever Tesla is buying cheap products off the shelf, but where necessary to meet some product objectives in the EV industry that still exist, Tesla is home to & The job and developing something better than what can be found on the market. The whole package is important, and Tesla seems to give it better than anyone else – by a line or two. After allowing, this seems to be an area where Volkswagen, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan and others could win land, but I still see any evidence that someone does better than Tesla.

We will see what Rivian, Lucid Motors, NIO, and other newbies can do. They have great people on their executive teams, they have years of combined experience, and appear to be making good progress. But there is not an easy task to go off the ground – ask Elon – and the market is far more competitive than it was 10 years ago. Having a production for 100,000 vehicles per year would be a firm signal for any of them that I think would achieve their objectives more in the discussion, but all of them differ from such a milestone. .

(TheSide note: UBS analysis of the Tesla Model 3 costs seems to be worsening off the mark because the analysts assume market prices for rare or unique products produced in Tesla. In other words, this design is a Tesla design and manufacture that led to Model 3 as a competitive vehicle.)

Software: Again, this is something that I think is usually briefly mentioned and as it passes from Tesla but it deserves extensive weight. Tesla has a software expertise in hand that can compete with almost any other leading software company. The company is constantly working hyperdrive to improve software, make it more efficient, make it more user friendly, persuaded to do more to customers, and to be dealing with more work that a human man would have to pay normally. Tesla software is not perfect! But it's probably from a completely different galaxy than the other car software. I can not imagine any large automaker that's up in the handful of years, and I think that the starter is more disadvantaged – they do not have so much money to pour out to the department though try to reach Tesla levels.

The only full loaded automated engineer in Silicon Valley must be helping. It may seem inconsistent in aviation and internet time, but the space-centered social-related links are still extremely relevant in different industries, and certainly EV production

Naturally, software developed in Tesla by Model 3, Model Y, lifting truck, Semi, Model S and Model X can be used. The most vehicles that bring vehicles fleet, the The most revenue it does, and the largest you can pump to develop software and refining. The core architecture for Tesla software business is already strong. Now the issue is to let the construction workers and executive managers do their jobs.

Stylio: Elon Musk and Franz von Holzhausen are easily congratulated for their elegant design, beauty, minimalist and permanent beauty of Tesla vehicles. Surely you hear someone saying that Tesla is ugly, but if you do it, it's hard not to wonder if the person is crazy, employed troll, or BMW / Volkswagen / GM / Ford employee.

What is perhaps more surprising, however, is how hard it is like other auto companies designing compulsory EV designs. We will put some props to Byton and Lucid Motors for pretty, modern but not too modern designs, across cultures, but I have not been very proud of the conceptual aesthetics of other EV startups. In terms of large automakers, sometimes they present wild and false designs such as iNext and Concept-i; and sometimes they present interesting, eye, but usual designs such as the new Crozz, Buzz, ID, LEAF, and EQC; but appear to be short when it comes to the sense of Tesla that competes for timely designs. (Or maybe I'm prone to.)

Y Monty Llawn: Put all this with each other and you have a powerful Tesla hand on four key components of any successful electric vehicle. Just as Tesla came to the place where there is electricity and now she lightens the light of years in front of other automatic electrical models, I must assume at this point that we will see the same type of initial result in the crossover (Model Y), the collection truck, and semi-width markets. Oh yes, and Tesla can throw some solar panels or tiles too. Who's going to offer the full package so seamless and competitive in the next decade? I would love to believe that Tesla will have some serious competition, but I would lie to myself (and you) if it came to the conclusion that any other automaker was a threat to Tesla's leadership.

The good news is simply that others are now try to catch up


Support the CleanTechnica work by becoming Member, The Supporter, or Ambassador.

Or you can buy a t-shirt, a cup, a baby's dress, a bag or a cold hoodie or do One-time gift on PayPal to support CleanTechnica's work.




Tags: Elon Musk, EV battles, Franz von Holzhausen, software, Tesla batteries, Tesla, Tesla design, Tesla Model 3, Tesla Model Y, TESLA PICKUP TRUCK, Tesla Semi, Tesla software


About Author

Zachary Shahan Zach is trying to help society help himself (and other species). It's most time spent here CleanTechnica as his director and main editor. He is also president Important Media and director / founder EV Obsession a Solar love. Zach is recognized worldwide as an electric, energy and solar vehicle and an energy storage specialist. He has introduced for cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, and Canada.

Zach has long-term investments in TSLA, FSLR, SPWR, SEDG, and ABB – after years of solar cover and EVs, he has a lot of faith in these specific companies and they feel they are clever companies good to invest in. It does not offer professional investment advice and instead it would not be responsible for losing money, so do not jump to conclusions.



[ad_2]
Source link