Wednesday , September 23 2020
Home / canada / Do not Work 80 Hours a Week for Elon Musk, or Anyone

Do not Work 80 Hours a Week for Elon Musk, or Anyone


There is a good sign that your manager is full of time when they promise that you're going to "change the world."

In broad terms, this sales point has based on a relatively new American ideology that you are, yes! A unique and special creature, and therefore deserve a meaningful job and bring value to the world. But comes from the technology sector – where such a mind has seen the right base for a parody point – it is trained in the legitimate reality of which new technology doing brings change, though not always for the better. Mainly, however, it seems to be a defense mechanism so that those who use technology justify their incredible salaries and their lifestyle.

That brings us to the recent announcement of Elon Musk about what he is looking for in an employee:

Musk would go on tweet "If you love what you're doing, (mostly) do not feel like work," determine although ideal working hours vary to every person, what he looks for is "about 80 continuously, over 100 at times."

Initially, the idea that working these types of hours is useful objectively suspicious: The 2014 analysis by Stanford economist, John Pencanvel, has reviewed the data of the Second World War's life plant and more recent literature to I conclude that more than 50 hours a week results in reduced returns, and may actually reduce output. There are other studies – not to mention federal government warnings about health and well-being – in the same way, suggesting that working through the time is bad for you and bad at work. In fact, the workplace hazard rate increased by 23 per cent according to the CUNY 2017 review of the relevant data sets approved for a 60-hour jobcentre.

But Musk is smart. He's not talking about it that good efficiency. He's talking about making the most of what he, the man with $ 24 billion, is spending on his own workforce.

This is what I think he really says: I want to cement my inheritance, and therefore my wealth and value to society, by changing the world through technology. To do that, I'll need your help, and for that, I'll be able to pay you a wage or preceding salary. But while you're here, I will try to draw extra work out of you by selling the idea that you are also changing the world. And if you do not fall for this, I'll find someone else who will.

This is like any headteacher, in fact. The headteacher wants to make money by doing something, and he will pay you to help get there. But in this system, it will always try to pay you as little as possible, because it will allow it to keep more money. (It may be reinvesting in the company, it's just just buying a boat – if it's such a private equity, this is probably the last one.) When that path & Being stopped because of a contract, he will try to get more food for his mum by continually impairing the line between "work" and "home" life. It will take you to wait after hours, tighten you with your smartphone, or just give you tasks that were not at all you signed up.

The last dream of any headteacher is to have one of their employees to believe that they are part of something great, that the project is worth the sacrifice, but without having to give them any benefit in the ownership of the company. The utopy is for the world, but it's the profit for it.

There is a fair question to ask what "change the world" even means, through the way. Greener transport by Tesla cars (and charging equipment) could help keep people world-wide for a longer period without destroying the planet completely, which is nice and good. But it also argues that it will represent some form of a clever escape valve from a capitalism campaign towards using global resources. Such splendid green technologies often appear more than anything else to make you feel less guilty, say, drive to and from everyday work. And while SpaceX is "cool" in a nerdy space examination, tourism for the super-rich is likely to be effective until (maybe) return to a series of planet escape guards; n die. (Musk has insisted that this is not the case).

Now imagine what could "change" to your own personal world. Could work less hours affect positively on its quality? Would it be able to give more time to your limited existence to other activities such as reading, writing, playing with children, exploring the world, or perhaps your own neighborhood, improving quality of life? Probably! And yet that's not what Musk tries to sell his potential workforce, because that's not even the world trying to use his technological enthusiasm to build. (Imagine going back to the year 1930 and telling someone about all the technological devices we've made, and then watch them drop down when you let them know how many hours people are still I have to work. If you did not tell the economist John Maynard Keynes, he would smack you across the face.)

Realistically, whatever Musk accomplishes during his life by directing his hired help to make a variety of technical items, it will be less changing to the world than that who fought and died for the eight hour working day, and the 40-hour working week, have to be delivered. You know, those people in unions or want to join one, the people that Musk has been spoiled and have been accused of repeatedly to target reprisal-a.k.a. busting union Such people have legally changed the legal conditions of world-wide lives in a way that Musk, or any manager, will never change.

Most damaging all the visual thoughts, usually, like Musk, can never dream of that kind of change.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of ISG that is presented to your mailbox on a daily basis.

Follow Rick Paulas on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on the USA.

Source link