Councilor Jeromy Farkas in chambers as Councilors prepares for budget discussions in Calgary on Monday, November 26, 2018. Darren Makowichuk / Postmedia
In the second, unconnected day of discussions on the proposed four-year civic budget, one city councilor made his castis by his colleagues for putting "famous damage" on the city hall.
The dispute began when Cllr. Jeromy Farkas had accused his colleagues of "bullying behavior", suggesting they had "staged walking" while speaking during a closed doorstep on labor discussions – a refusal that was rejected by his colleagues on Tuesday.
"When you play with fire, this can happen. If you constantly treat your colleagues inconsiderate (then) why do you expect respect back?" The Mayor Naheed Nenshi on Tuesday after Farkas tried to raise the issue in public following the camera meeting.
"You should be happy to say the same thing around this board that you are saying to the press. I hope that you will use this as an opportunity to reflect on your behavior."
A number of councilors on Tuesday said that they were outstanding to public comments made by Farkas in the past, "endorsed the integrity and reputation of elected and unexpected officers, and the city hall's establishment.
Some councilors said that Farkas was responsible for circulating "inaccurate information" about council and city staff pensions.
Others seem to be offending to Farkas's recent suggestion of inappropriateness regarding the city's practice of giving money to let councilors buy a ticket for their service.
In recent years, instead of gifts such as watch or counterfeit, $ 500 councilors were offered to buy their own service gift. Former advisor, Ray Jones, said on Tuesday that the practice had emerged after gold prices that sent the cost of the circles to the thousands.
"We did not pay for the ring, so we said we would put money around a circle or watch and this is the one they choose," said Jones, adding councilors who left behind 2017 municipal election that had provided with money for the purpose.
Cllr. Jeff Davison said he was walking out of the in-camera meeting on Tuesday out of unexpected and as a result of the conversation looking at a topic.
"Maybe he feels bullying, maybe he did not," said Davison following the garlic debate. "The truth is that it seems to open its mouth with a view to causing harm and damage to this company's reputation, to the city, to the administration, to the 14th of other people around the table with him.
"Enough enough. I think that's what you've seen here today."
Later asking for the decision from his colleagues, Farkas said "it's not about me."
"I do not apologize for fighting for the people that I represent," said Farkas.
"I'm not going to let things be personal."