Sunday , August 14 2022

Furor Marie Kondo: is an order and cleanliness helping to achieve happiness? – 02/22/2019



[ad_1]

Niwt and orders, happier? Are we able to ban things that we are no longer using, hyper-use traces, from the only fact of asking us what current mean they have in our lives?

The existence of home-based objects and their influence on everyday life seems to be existential constraints: "Why do I live poor if I can live better?" "Does the mess talk about how I am?"

Look too

The effect of the "Marie Kondo philosophy" falls across the world with the residues that the user's society installs at the time as important. Everything is subject to revision according to a "not working criterion, I do not use it, it does not make me happy".

It does not seem strange to me that this method is the result of a woman in the rising sun country, which has shown ability for organization and work, and that also integrates the wisdom of the ancestors with modernity. Anyway, Stunning, at times of feministism and changes in gender roles, that a way that has aimed at the female audience and home role is so successful.

Look too

And to the opposite: is the disorder and the collection causing unhappiness?

There is no full evidence to answer this question. There are people who find it in order to be more calm and satisfied with themselves. See the clean house, rejecting objects that are no longer used, ordering places, especially when it has been deferred for months or years, causes welfare, is a task that is achieved as achievement.

But all expressions of behavior are extremes and to willows. The healthy side is not obsessive, that is, cleaning, ordering, arranging the house or other places, while continuing to do other activities that could give us an equal or better benefit. It also does not intend to put a model of perfection on other people that provoke fighting and conflicts.

Are we able to exclude things that we are no longer using, some sorts of traces to eat, from the only thing to ask us what current mean they have in our lives?

Are we able to exclude things that we are no longer using, some sorts of traces to eat, from the only thing to ask us what current mean they have in our lives?

Look too

On the other hand, accumulation and disorder is not good either. Living in that condition of personal deterioration is closer to pathology than positive positivity. We know that people who collect valuable objects agree with them with the conviction "they will serve at some time," fill in the house and & # 39; the surrounding area with fake, cruelty and dirty odors. There are also those who keep it because of past pastures. People who have experienced war or hunger know that everything is worth, so objects need to be cared for so that they last for years. The common denominator is both obsessive (for cleaning or keeping things that can be used at some point).. Complying with the obsessive idea is to calm down the entity that causes disorder or store things with no value or sensitive use. In any way is this happiness.

Look too

Is tired being helping creativity?

Just as we find organized people (and also pretend that the rest) too, there are those that fit all sorts of disorder that do not change their mental state. Here are those who know where to find things because they have inserted a mental order that allows them to find the objects that are sought within a heterogeneous sea of things. They find a place with more sensory openness (they still capture and remember the better location of objects) in contrast to topics that focus attention and disagree with disorder. There is an agreement among behavioral psychologists that intentions to bring an order are present, they just do not decide to do so. Deferral causes more anxiety and confusion because you do not know where and when to start. It is called "flashing effect" to the steps of jumping or spreading over without deciding to face them once and for all. The most creative people can perform their jobs in disorder because they do not worry or have a priority in their lives. There are many serious studies related to this ability to create with external disorder.

Look too

Marie Kondo and feminist

Marie Kondo was not the first. In the decade of 90 it appears that the first writings of Regina Leeds are taking the order and Feng Shui (currently "Zen Arranged") with more than ten published books. The Japanese is not far behind and its philosophy expands like fireworks. However, the time Regina does not appear the same as Marie. Something has changed in these years and women are not willing to carry out a task of such an order, leaving only 30 books in the library and above all I expect Happiness comes from his / her work and actions. .

Perhaps the difference between Leeds and Kondo is that the first suggests that "As your interior is your environment", which was in addition to work, the woman was blameless for internal disruption of such; On the other hand, Marie Kondo adapts more to these times and leaves the sermons apart from some subjective resistance, focusing on the outside as a factor of internal silence. What is striking is the diffusion of a model of happiness with a strict audience with one female: why a woman, a bookshop, on YouTube, or on Netflix, chooses the Kondo innocent sweetness and her; for advice from "More work for me" or "happiness for a charity" or "at the cost of sacrificing a classical collection and leaving only 30 books on the shelves?"

Look too

Of course, the teachings point to a female, middle-class audience, with a good level of eating and plenty of space to store objects. You can not ask for minimalism in a small home where things have been restrained and saved according to need and group protection. The explanation for the success of the method at times of feminist trouble may be due to different factors. There is a more radical group that continues to protect that home-based tasks are female and male occupations that do not even question what is set up by the patriarchate. On the other hand, the house has become an agreed place, no place for boredom or loneliness. The progress of the series, the technological devices, the applications, creates the fact that the home offers everything. Virtual objects come objects: fewer decorations, souvenirs, printed pictures, books, CDs, pictures, full cabinets, papers, taxes, etc. Everything is saved in file format.

Facing this scenario that seems to solve everything, the search for happiness is valid, which shows that nothing has been done enough. If before the utopia and emotions of life animated with ideas, projects and a desire to get personal satisfaction, it is not currently enough. People are less prepared to get rid of frustration, there is less capacity and courage to turn the maker when necessary, fear of uncertainty is deeper, and above all, we hope that someone or something will be something; The outdoors solve the life, even if it's a small action that shakes the order a bit.

Dr. Walter Ghedin, psychiatrist and sexologist.

Look too

[ad_2]
Source link