The telecommunications and Government bill, if implemented without radical changes, will have a "devastating" effect on the ICT sector, destroying the incentives that have led to almost general mobile provision in South Africa.
That is behind MTN, who has made written representations on the controversial Electronic Communications Bill before the parliamentary hearings on the subject of Thursday.
Vodacom, in his presentation (see article), who called on the government not to rush the bill through parliament, saying "it should carefully prepare and consider the far-reaching implications (and we will say substantially detrimentally) the bill for the sector and consumers".
In its introduction, MTN ponds are what it calls on Government government policy on infrastructure competition and described the proposal to "set open open, cost-based access to a competitive market" as "draconian and unreasonable". He said that this policy will turn "a devastating effect on the model that introduced R100 billion and more investment over the past decade."
"It will destroy the incentives that have provided over 98% of 3G coverage, a top quality 4G network (currently covering 90%, although LTE spectrum is not released) and investment in increasing fiber, compromising the future of 5G South Africa. "
Hard presentations suggest that Vodacom and MTN run out of options to push for the refurbishment of the draft legislation and are now preparing to tackle government policies over policy changes, they believe they will seriously undermine the industry.
& # 39; Default & # 39;
"Why would MTN (or any other network player) continue to invest in its stable and mobile network when it is currently able to access the Telkom or Vodacom network?" MTN said his presentation.
"In turn, why would Telkom and Vodacom continue to invest in expanding network and innovation if they do not benefit from it, only cost-based forms of MTN (and other service providers)?"
MTN said that such a proposal would be "unexpected" in any other industry. It meant forced airlines to offer seats for their competitors at a cost. "Which airlines would ever invest in aircraft on that basis?"
He would like to ask automobile manufacturers to build cars for competitors at no cost. "Which automotive producers would ever ever invest in a factory in South Africa?" MTN asked.
The bill is also unconstitutional, he said. It breaks the property clause of the composition, fails to satisfy the logical requirement set by section 1 (c) and section 22, and it is "unpleasant invalid".
He warned that the best networking competition was in favor of a cost based service model without an "international premise in telecommunications".
"Despite a long policy debate, the cost / benefit of this seismic change has not been measured, and MTN's concerns have been constantly ignored."
He also warned that the government's plan to create a wholesale open access network, or Woan, was "internationally disadvantaged" and "reducing networks competition".
"South Africa could resign to a common, low quality standard network (the Woan)," said MTN. "Although MTN is supportive of a level field hybrid model (where commercial operators and Woan co-live), a policy that connects the release of surplus spectrum to license Woan's controversial risks that delays its spectrum availability great need for South Africa. "
He said that Icasa's communications regulator should allocate a spectrum to the Woan and immediately certify the spectrum to commercial operators.
"These issues are as complex as they are essential to the economic future of South Africa. MTN recommends that they are considered in a meaningful way, not on the blocked timetable that is being There is too much risk by experimenting with unproven and unqualified policies for such an important sector and growth engine. "
This article was published with TechCentral's permission. The original announcement can be found here.